[ public commitments · updated 8 may 2026 ]

The listing policy.

Revuo is the directory AI assistants cite when buyers ask for B2B SaaS recommendations. That only works if the data is real. These eight rules are the contract — public commitments, not internal guidelines.

[ the short version ]

Listings are typed capability claims, not free text. Every claim points at evidence on the vendor's own site. A weekly crawler validates the evidence. Every product result — on the website and via the public MCP endpoint at https://www.revuo.ai/api/mcp — carries a verifiedAt timestamp so callers know how fresh the data is.

Claims that fail validation flip to unverified. Listings that stay stale get removed. Editorial is editorial; paid placement is labeled. Reviews and ratings, where present, are separate from tier.

[ the eight rules ]

01 ]

Active-product gate

Every listed product must have a working trial, self-serve demo, or sandbox. Vaporware and waitlists are rejected. The W3 crawler re-checks listing URLs continuously; products whose site returns 404 or 5xx repeatedly are flagged for editorial review.

02 ]

Identified founder gate

Vendor-claimed listings require at least one named, LinkedIn-verified team contact with a matching work-domain email. No anonymous claims, ever. Free-tier (unverified) listings can exist without a claim, but are flagged that way to every reader.

03 ]

Capability schema completeness

Verified and Featured listings must fill the structured capability schema for their category. AI-drafted descriptions are allowed but must pass a genericity threshold — "AI-powered everything" prose is rejected. The capability taxonomy is canonical (lowercase kebab-case slugs) and shared between humans and the MCP surface.

04 ]

Verifiable claims

Every integration, format-support, standard, or compliance claim points at an evidence URL on the vendor's site. The W3 crawler validates each claim weekly: it fetches the evidence URL and looks for the canonical signal (the integration name, the format identifier, the certification name). Validation is conservative — false negatives are preferred over false positives. Numeric claims ("1,000+ teams") require linked sources or are stripped.

05 ]

Continuous re-verification

Listings are re-validated on a weekly cadence. Every product surfaces a verifiedAt timestamp on its detail page and in every MCP response. Listings stale beyond 180 days flip to unverified; beyond 365 days they are removed.

06 ]

3-strike misleading-claim rule

A documented misleading claim — verified through evidence, not opinion — gets a warning. A second strike adds a public note on the listing. A third strike removes the listing and bans re-claiming for 12 months. Removals are logged publicly.

07 ]

Editorial firewall

Paid placements are clearly labeled. Featured tier exists; sponsored content does not appear inside editorial "Best of" lists or capability comparison tables. Editorial selections (Editor's Choice, Top Rated) are independent of tier and disclosed as such.

08 ]

Community flag → human review

Signed-in users can flag any listing or claim. Three flags from distinct users trigger an editor review within 7 days. Verified-founder flags against competitors are weighted down; cross-category flagging by trusted users is weighted up. The flagging system is reputation-aware, not popularity-driven.

[ capability taxonomy ]

Five kinds of claim. Closed by design.

Every claim a listing can make has a kind. The kind drives what evidence the crawler looks for, and how the MCP surface answers structured queries. New shapes only land if a vertical actually needs them.

integration  ]
A native integration with another named product or service — Salesforce, DATEV, HubSpot, Shopify. Evidence URL points at the vendor's integrations page or doc; the crawler validates the named target appears there.
compliance  ]
Compliance with a published certification — SOC2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA. Evidence URL is the trust page or certification listing; the crawler validates the certificate name appears.
format  ]
Support for a data format — XRechnung, ZUGFeRD, Peppol BIS, EDIFACT. Evidence URL points at the vendor's format-support documentation. Format claims drive the regulatory long-tail (DACH e-invoicing, etc.).
standard  ]
Implementation of an industry / protocol standard — eCl@ss, ETIM, GS1, OData, OpenAPI. Distinct from Format because standards typically govern interchange or modeling rather than a serialization.
workflow  ]
A workflow or governance capability — approval workflows, audit trails, role-based permissions, multi-tenant isolation. Workflow claims aren't crawler-validatable in the same way; they rely on evidence in the form of product documentation or screenshots.

Capability slugs are canonical kebab-case (salesforce-integration, xrechnung-support, soc2) and shared between the website, the public MCP, and the long-tail capability pages at /features.

[ removals ledger ]

Every listing removed under the 3-strike rule is logged publicly with the date, the rule it violated, and a brief description. The ledger lives at /policy/removals.

Disagree with a removal? Email [email protected] with evidence. Re-listings happen when claims are fixed and re-validated.

[ see the rules in practice ]

The policy is the contract. These pages are where it shows up — verified listings, structured capability data, and the agent surface that returns the same data programmatically.